Correlates of voluntary blood donation among people in a hill capital in India

Namgay Shenga, Ranabir Pal, Subhabrata Sengupta, Shrayan Pal

Abstract


In an attempt to understand the problems and to improve voluntary blood donation at Gangtok, East Sikkim, this study was designed to assess the possible reasons for donating and not donating blood. Study Design: Population based cross-sectional study; Study Period: 01.01.2004 to 30.03.2004. (Three months activity); Setting: Gangtok, East Sikkim; Interventions: None; Study Population: 300 adults; Sampling Technique: Two-stage cluster sampling technique; Main Outcome Measures: socioeconomic and demographic variables of
voluntary blood donation. Data Collection Procedure: Three hundred adults were selected from the adult population of Gangtok, East Sikkim. Then by interview technique the principal investigator Dr. Namgay Shenga collected the data using the pretested, close-ended structured schedule. In 300 adults, the study showed a significant association between attitude towards voluntary blood donation and education. There was a significant association between knowledge about blood donation and attitude towards voluntary blood donation, along with moral obligation, charity and duty parameters. Variables that were not significantly associated with voluntary blood donation were age, sex, religion, marital status, community status, occupation and per-capita monthly income. Several possible reasons have been put forward for not donating blood voluntarily, varying from problems of time, procedure and physical health.
The finding of the study indicated that education gives birth to an ocean of difference between the positive attitudes of the general mass towards voluntary blood donation, in true life practice. The results suggested that reinforced steps should be taken to educate the population about voluntary blood donation.
Key words: Attitude, variables, voluntary blood donation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Facts about blood and blood banking. Available from: http//www.

aabb.org/All about blood/FAG/aabb_fags.htm. [last accessed on

Jun 10].

Luby S, Khanani R, Zia M, Vellani Z, Ali M, Qureshi AH, et al.

Evaluation of blood bank practices in Karachi, Pakistan and the

Governments Response. Health Policy Plan 2000;15:217-22.

Park K. Preventive and Social Medicine. 18th ed. Jabalpur, India:

Banarsidas Bhanot; 2005. p. 9-413.

Custer B, Johnson ES, Sullivan SD, Hazlet TK, Ramsey ST,

Hirschler NV, et al. Quantifying losses to the donated blood

supply due to donor deferral and miscollection. Transfusion

;44:1417-26.

Riley W, Schwei M, McCullough J. The United States’ potential

blood donor pool: estimating the prevalence of donor-exclusion

factors on the pool of potential donors. Transfusion 2007;47:1180-8.

Choudhury LP, Tetali S. Ethical challenges in voluntary blood

donation in Kerala, India. J Med Ethics 2007;33:140-2.

Mathai J. Raman Kutty V. On transfusion medicine. Curr Sci

;70:353-4,356-7.

Quality Assurance Transfusion Medicine Services in SEAR

Countries. Available from: http://w3.whosea.org/bct/qassrnce/

overview.htm. [last accessed on 2003 Nov 12].

Health and Family welfare Department, Government of Sikkim:

Annual reports: 2001-2002: 49.

Census of India; Provisional Population Total, Rural and Urban

distribution, Series-12, Sikkim Paper - 2 of 2001.

NFHS-2, Sikkim, National Family Health Survey India 1998 - 99,

International Institute for Population sciences.

Wiwanitkit V. Knowledge about blood donation among a sample

of Thai university students. Vox Sang 2002;83:97-9.

Hosain GM, Anisuzzaman M, Begum A. Knowledge and Attitude

towards voluntary blood donation among Dhaka university

students in Bangladesh. East Afr Med J 1997;74:549-53.

Boulware LE, Ratner LE, Ness PM, Cooper LA, Campell-Lee S,

LaVeist TA, et al. The contribution of sociodemographic, medical,

and attitudinal factors to blood donation among the general public:

Transfusion 2002;42:669-78.

Mwaba K, Keikelame MJ. Blood donation behavior and beliefs

among a sample of high school students in Mmabatho. Curationis

;18:2-3.

Nilsson B, Sojka P. The blood donation experience: Perceived

physical, psychological and social impact of blood donation on

the donor. Vox Sang 2003;84:120-8.

Buciuniene I, Stonienë L, Blazeviciene A, Kazlauskaite R,

Skudiene V. Blood donors’ motivation and attitude to nonremunerated

blood donation in Lithuania. BMC Public Health

;6:166.

Marantidou O, Loukopoulou L, Zervou E, Martinis G, Egglezou A,

Fountouli P, et al. Factors that motivate and hinder blood donation

in Greece. Transfus Med 2007;17:443-50.

Nguyen DD, Devita DA, Hirschler NV, Murphy EL. Blood

donor satisfaction and intention of future donation. Transfusion

;48:742-8.

Schlumpf KS, Glynn SA, Schreiber GB, Wright DJ, Randolph

Steele W, Tu Y, et al. Factors influencing donor return. Transfusion

;48:264-72.

Martín-Santana JD, Beerli-Palacio A. Potential donor segregation

to promote blood donation. Transfus Apher Sci 2008;38:133-40.

Steele WR, Schreiber GB, Guiltinan A, Nass C, Glynn SA,

Wright DJ, et al. Role of altruistic behavior, empathetic concern,

and social responsibility motivation in blood donation behavior.

Transfusion 2008;48:43-54.

Sojka BN, Sojka P. The blood donation experience: self-reported

motives and obstacles for donating blood. Vox Sang 2008;94:56-63.

Harrington M, Sweeney MR, Bailie K, Morris K, Kennedy A,

Boilson A. What would encourage blood donation in Ireland?

Vox Sang 2007;92:361-7.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22377/ijgp.v3i2.78

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.