Anthelmintic activity of aerial parts of Costus speciosus

Shruti Srivastava, Pradeep Singh, K. K. Jha, Garima Mishra, Sourabh Srivastava, R. L. Khosa

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the anthelmintic activity of the methanolic and aqueous extracts of the aerial parts of Costus speciosus in Indian adult earthworms (Pheretima posthuma). The anthelmintic activity of methanolic (25 mg/ml, 50 mg/ml and 100 mg/ml) and aqueous extracts (25 mg/ml, 50 mg/ml and 100 mg/ml) of the aerial parts of Costus speciosus was evaluated using Indian adult earthworms (Pheretima posthuma) as experimental worms. Albendazole (20 mg/ml) was used as standard drug. The anthelmintic potency of the extracts was inversely proportional to the time taken for paralysis or death of the worms. All the results were expressed as a mean±SEM. The aqueous extract showed more significant effect on paralyzing the worms, in terms of paralysis time, at every concentration compared to that of methanolic extract when compared with standard. In case of the methanolic
extract at 25 mg/ml, 50 mg/ml and 100 mg/ml concentrations paralysis was observed at 8.10±0.37, 3.97±0.40 and 2.72±0.26 min respectively and death at 8.88±0.40, 4.78±0.32 and 3.70±0.45 min respectively. The aqueous extract at dose of 25 mg/ml, 50 mg/ml and 100 mg/ml produced paralysis within 6.70±0.33, 3.62±0.30 and 2.55±0.27 min respectively while death was observed within 7.48±0.32, 4.48±0.31 and 3.62±0.29 min respectively. The standard drug Albendazole (20 mg/ml) showed paralysis at 11.65±0.51 min and death occurred after 13.67±0.36 min. As Costus speciosus showed significant anthelmintic activity in the experimental study, it
can be used as a promising anthelmintic agent.
Key words: Albendazole, anthelmintic activity, Costus speciosus, Pheretima posthuma


Full Text:

PDF

References


Choudhury GB, Nayak BS, Jena PK, Panda SK, Ellaiah P.

Phytochemical investigation and screening for anthelmintic

activity of leafy extracts of various Ocimum (Tulsi) species. J Pharm

Res 2010;3:2140‑1.

Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM, Flower RJ. Rang and Dale’s

Pharmacology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone

Elsevier; 2007. p. 712.

Anonymous. The Wealth of India. Second supplement series (Raw

materials) Vol. 2. New Delhi: NISCAIR, CSIR; 2007. p. 211‑3.

Gupta RK. Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. 1st ed. New Delhi: CBS

Publishers and Distributors; 2010. p. 234, 499.

Deni B. Encyclopedia of Herbs. The Royal Horticulture Society.

London: Dorling Kindersley; 2008. p. 181.

Chopra RN, Nayar SL, Chopra IC. Glossary of Indian Medicinal

Plants. New Delhi: NISCAIR Press; 2006. p.79

Khare CP. Indian medicinal plants. India: Springer (India) Private

Limited; 2007. p. 181‑2.

Nadkarni KM, Nadkarni AK. Indian Materia Medica, Vol. 1.

Mumbai: Bombay Popular Prakashan, Pvt Ltd; 2007. p. 385‑6.

Bhattacharya SK, Parikh AK. Anticholinesterase activity of Costus

speciosus Alkaloid. Indian J Pharmacol 1972;4:178‑9.

Das S, Sheeja TE, Mandal AB. Ethanomedicinal uses of certain

plants of Bay Islands. Indian J Tradit Knowl 2006;5:207‑11.

Chatterjee KD. Parasitology, protozoology and helminthology,

Calcutta: Guha Ray Sree Saraswaty Press Ltd; 1967. p. 168‑9.

Sollmann T. Anthelmintics: Their efficiency as tested on earth

worms. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1918;12:129‑70.

Shivkumar YM, Kumar VL. Anthelmintic activity of latex of

Calotropis procera. Pharm Biol 2003;41:263‑5.

Ajaiyeoba EO, Onocha PA, Olarenwaju OT. In vitro anthelmintic

properties of Buchholzia coriaceae and Gynandropsis gynandra extract.

Pharm Biol 2001;39:217‑20.

Borkar VS, Gangurde HH, Gulecha VS, Bhoyar PK, Mundada

AS. Evaluation of in vitro antihelmintic activity of leaves of Butea

monosperma. Int J Phytomed 2010;2:31‑5.

Patil AP, Patil VV, Patil VR, Chaudhari RY. Anthelmintic and

preliminary phytochemical screening of leaves of Ficus carica

linn against intestinal helminthiasis. Int J Res Ayurveda Pharm

;1:601‑5.

Saraf A. Phytochemical and antimicrobial studies of medicinal

plant Costus Speciosus. E. J Chem 2010;7:405‑13




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22377/ijgp.v5i4.222

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.